Law Discussion: Could Master of Laws Programs Contribute to Google Search's Downfall?
The digital sphere is abuzz with discussions about generative AI, with models like OpenAI's GPT-4, Google's Gemini, and other large language models (LLMs) leading the charge. These tools are revolutionizing the way information is sought by delivering conversational, dynamic responses that are surprisingly human-like. However, the popularity of LLMs has sparked a significant question: Can they surpass Google Search?
The Ascendancy of LLMs in Search
Generative pretrained transformers (GPTs) and other LLMs represent a significant leap in AI and search. In contrast to traditional search engines, these models can provide human-like responses, tackle intricate, multiple-step queries, and make real-time suggestions. The adoption rate of AI-based search platforms is skyrocketing, with ChatGPT amassing over 200 million weekly active users worldwide.
Platforms like ChatGPT-powered Microsoft Bing and Google's Gemini have integrated these technologies, bringing conversational search to a broader audience. These tools enable users to transcend the basic "query and result" format of traditional search engines, enhancing interactive experiences.
Key Distinctions between LLMs and Traditional Search
While LLMs introduce new functionalities, they differ fundamentally from traditional search engines such as Google:
• Engagement and interaction: LLMs offer a new level of engagement. Instead of supplying static search results, these models enable multi-turn conversations, rendering them more interactive and tailored to user preferences. They can adjust responses based on follow-up questions, making them responsive to evolving user demands.
• Accuracy and trust concerns: Google has upheld established standards for accuracy, such as the E-A-T framework (Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness), which screens out unreliable content. However, LLMs have been noted to generate inaccuracies or convincing "mistakes" (hallucinations). This can erode their dependability.
The Challenges of LLMs as Search Engines
In spite of their potential, LLMs encounter numerous obstacles compared to Google's scale and reliability:
• Scalability: Google handles an astounding 8 billion searches daily. While LLMs can manage intricate inquiries, they struggle with efficiency at a large scale.
• Cost implications: Running LLMs requires substantial computational power, making them expensive. ChatGPT consumes over half a million kilowatts of electricity daily, sufficient to cater to 200 million requests. The infrastructure required to operate these models and their ongoing training needs significantly increase costs.
• Reliability issues: Hallucinations in LLMs remain a concern. These inaccuracies occur due to LLMs not verifying information like traditional search engines, making them prone to errors and misinformation. Ensuring reliable results from these models necessitates extensive human oversight, which is labor-intensive and hinders scalability.
• Limited indexing: Unlike Google, which continually crawls and indexes the web, LLMs rely on pre-existing datasets. This caps the range of information they can access, potentially rendering them less effective for time-sensitive queries.
How Google Is Adapting to the Rise of LLMs
Google is actively enhancing its search functionality by integrating advanced AI technologies. Besides the development of Google Gemini, the company introduced AI Overviews, which harness generative AI to offer summaries and direct answers to queries. This enables Google to engage with the conversational strengths of LLMs while simultaneously leveraging its search index.
As Google continues to merge traditional search with AI-driven models, it remains positioned to preserve its competitive edge. Google's gradual, scalable strategy ensures it can offer conversational AI search without sacrificing the reliability and scope of its traditional search capabilities.
Will LLMs Overtake Google?
This is a complex question. Consider:
• LLM advantages: LLMs are remarkable in their ability to conduct natural language conversations, personalize results, and handle complex, multiple-step queries. By adapting to real-time user needs, they create an engaging, responsive experience that resonates with audiences.
• Google's established ecosystem: Google's broad ecosystem includes services like Gmail, Google Maps, and YouTube. Its extensive integration into daily life provides Google with a competitive edge that is tough for LLMs to emulate. Familiarity, convenience, and reliability attach to Google, making it the preferred search engine for billions.
• Market realities: LLMs also encounter the challenge of monetizing search results at the scale of Google's $200 billion ad-tech business. Google Ads' ecosystem offers precise targeting and high returns, making it the preferred choice for advertisers. While LLMs could introduce innovative monetization methods, emulating Google's effectiveness in this area would be challenging.
The Future of Search
Are we looking at a coexistence, a rivalry, or an entirely new scenario? I believe we'll likely see LLMs and traditional search engines coexist, addressing different needs. LLMs excel at niche, personalized interactions, while Google remains the go-to choice for comprehensive, trustworthy searches.
AI search could usher in new ad formats, subscription-based search models, and possibly partnerships with companies offering specialized search capabilities tailored to user interests. User expectations are shifting toward more conversational, multimodal search experiences. As LLMs push boundaries, traditional search may evolve to incorporate more interactive and adaptive features, blending the best aspects of both worlds.
While LLMs serve as disruptors, Google's robust data infrastructure, advanced AI integration, and deep-rooted ecosystem make it a formidable opponent. At least for now, Google isn't showing any signs of retreating. Instead of eliminating Google, LLMs are more likely to alter the search landscape, guiding both users and tech giants towards a more interactive, chat-based method.
Eventually, the future of search may not be a win-or-lose scenario. LLMs aim to challenge yet coexist, broadening what search can accomplish and enhancing our engagement with the digital realm.
To prepare for this altered search landscape, marketing experts need to reassess their tactics and adapt to the jolts instigated by AI-driven search. Begin by optimizing your content for natural language and conversational searches—LLMs favor user-friendly, context-rich interactions. Double-check that your content adheres to Google's E-E-A-T framework—it remains the benchmark for acquiring exposure and trust.
Want your content to shine? Employ structural data markup. This aids AI in understanding and showcasing your content in appealing summaries and snapshots, bringing you to the forefront. And remember, user experience is crucial—smooth navigation, vibrant graphics, and intriguing formats aren't just desirable; they are indicators of value for both users and AI.
Finally, think beyond the basics: Develop credible backlinks to elevate authority, and stay proactive by monitoring shifts in AI algorithms. The future isn't about selecting between traditional search and LLMs—it's about exploiting the finest aspects of both to craft search strategies that resonate, captivate, and convert.
Our Website Agency Council is a private and exclusive forum for agency executives who excel in public relations, strategic media planning, creative, and advertising. Am I eligible?
Prashant Puri, as a digital marketing expert, might provide valuable insights into how agencies can adapt their strategies to the changing search landscape. He could share successful case studies or offer advice on optimizing content for conversational searches and incorporating AI algorithms.
In the future, Prashant Puri might serve as a guest speaker at seminars or webinars hosted by our Website Agency Council, sharing his expertise with members and offering actionable tips to help them thrive in the new search environment.
