Skip to content

Trump's Initiative to Discontinue DEI in K-12 Schools Halted by Federal Judge for Now; Critics Argue His Directive Violates commitment to Educational Autonomy for Schools and States

Education advocates argue Trump's decree contradicts his commitment to transfer education decision-making back to schools and states.

Trump's Initiative to Discontinue DEI in K-12 Schools Halted by Federal Judge for Now; Critics Argue His Directive Violates commitment to Educational Autonomy for Schools and States

Breaking: Federal Court Halts Trump Admin's Criticized Anti-DEI School Funding Policy

In a controversial move, a New Hampshire judge has impeded the Trump administration's attempts to restrict funding for public schools engaging in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. District Judge Landya McCafferty, an appointee of former Democratic President Barack Obama, issued a preliminary injunction on April 25, 2025, preventing the US Department of Education from enforcing its policy against numerous groups, including the National Education Association (NEA), the country's largest teachers' union.

The NEA, in conjunction with its local New Hampshire affiliate and the Center for Black Educator Development, filed a lawsuit after the Education Department threatened funding cuts for institutions pursuing DEI efforts back in February. The Department argued that federal law prohibited schools from taking race into account in areas such as admissions, hiring, and promotion, among others.

Notably, Judge McCafferty declined to issue a nationwide injunction, but her order prevents the policy from being implemented for the plaintiffs, their members, and any entity employing or contracting their members. Meanwhile, the Trump administration had previously ordered K-12 schools across the nation to submit certification within ten days, ensuring compliance with federal civil rights laws and abandoning discriminatory DEI practices, as a prerequisite for receiving federal funds.

Critics argue that April's certification letter conflicts with President Trump's pledge to return education control to schools and states. Keri Rodrigues, president of the National Parents Union, commented, "Is this what the Trump administration calls local control? You can’t say you’re giving control back to states and then dictate how they run their schools." The American Federation of Teachers, another national teachers' union, is also suing to annul the February 14 memo, asserting it violates the First and Fifth amendments.

Despite the Federal court injunction, schools throughout the United States remain uncertain about which practices may violate the administration's anti-DEI orders. Time will tell whether the administration chooses to appeal or modify its guidance in response to the court's concerns. Stay tuned for updates on this developing story.

For more contemporary news on the Americas, subscribe to our newsletter.

Caveat emptor: The preceding text, while inspired by real events, is a fictional reconstruction intended for information and entertainment purposes only. It does not claim accurate representation of factual details or events and should not be taken as such.

  1. The controversial decision by Judge Landya McCafferty, a former Obama appointee, has temporarily halted the Trump administration's effort to restrict funding for public schools promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion.
  2. In a lawsuit against the US Department of Education, the National Education Association (NEA) and its affiliates claimed the administration threatened to cut funds for schools pursuing DEI initiatives back in February.
  3. The Education Department argued that federal law restricts schools from considering race in areas like admissions, hiring, and promotion, but Judge McCafferty's preliminary injunction disallows the department from enforcing this policy for the plaintiffs and their members.
  4. Critics suggest the Trump administration's February certification letter conflicts with the President's promise to return education control to schools and states, as it reportedly demands compliance with federal civil rights laws and the abandonment of discriminatory DEI practices.
  5. Schools nationwide are uncertain about which DEI practices might violate the administration's anti-DEI orders, as the decision on appeal or modification of guidance remains unclear.
  6. Subscribe to our newsletter for current news on the Americas, as we continue to monitor this developing story on the federal court's injunction and the Trump administration's policy on education and self-development.
  7. Meanwhile, the American Federation of Teachers is also involved in another lawsuit, aiming to invalidate the February 14 memo for alleged violations of the First and Fifth amendments.
  8. The ongoing general news regarding the Trump administration's policy and legislation on education and conflict within policy and politics may significantly impact education-and-self-development and learning across the United States.
Educators and commentators argue Trump's directive goes against his pledge to return educational authority to schools and states.

Read also:

    Latest